Would legal a tenet firm request a costs through Western Union Quick Collect? I received a call from a "tenet firm" today & the guy

I received a call from a "tenet firm" today & the guy said that I owe a debt from 2001 but he wouldn't send any information because he states a final communiqu�� was sent. I know contained by at least 3 years I haven't received anything. I required to know what he was discussion about so I asked for more info & he told me I be screwing myself by not cooperating & that I entail to send $148 for a returned check (from 2001) to a pizza common 7 yrs ago. I don't even recall bouncing a check that long ago. I asked for an address & he wouldn't present me one but would give me a fax number & some info to pay cheque "my debt" through Western Union. I am unable to find a meeting (on the companies information) through Reverse Phone Numbers & I am unable to locate the canon firm through the Attorney General or Better Business Bureau. I'm concerned. I wouldn't send them anything. It could be a scam.

What be the fax number that was given to you? What be the name of the tenet firm? If it was legal, they would give you a mail address and provide you with some information on the debt.

You might want to capture a copy of your credit report from the 3 credit reporting agencies (TransUnion, Equifax and Experian) which you can get for free once a year from the Federal Trade Commission's website https://www.annualcreditreport.com See if this "debt" appears on your credit report.

Anyone with a fax gadget & a phone can call anyone else and emergency payment for a debt. If he is legal and the debt is legitimate, he should be capable of provide documentation to you. If not, he is just trying to scam you. Tell him to nick a walk into the middle of Lake Erie and fly a kite from nearby while he walks on the hose down. Don't distribute them one penny! If he calls again, state: Per the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, I am requesting written validation of this alleged debt.

Don't agree to them scare you next to bogus threats...they have NO power over you...It is crooked for debt collectors to pretend to be attorneys.

Scammer! Check on http://www.whocalled.us/ see if anyone else have listed that number and resign from your comments... By law, they are REQUIRED to verify the debt in writing! Try pulling a copy of your credit report and checking for yourself... BTW, Western Union / Moneygram is the scammers BEST friend!

Answers: Don't sweat it, this is just a cast-offs debt collector. Wait for him to call put money on and inform him that he has violated the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act by refuse to provide you with documentation on the subject of the debt. Tell him to look up the following"
15 U.S.C. �� 1692e. False or misleading representations

A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or money in nouns with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the broad application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this article:
(1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated beside the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof.
(2) The false representation of--
(A) the persona, amount, or legal status of any debt; or
(B) any services rendered or compensation which may be with permission received by any debt collector for the collection of a debt.
(3) The false representation or implication that any individual is an attorney or that any communication is from an attorney.
(4) The representation or suggestion that nonpayment of any debt will result in the arrest or custody of any person or the tremor, garnishment, attachment, or sale of any property or wages of any character unless such action is legal and the debt collector or creditor intends to take such endeavour.
(5) The threat to take any management that cannot legally be taken or to be precise not intended to be taken.
(6) The false representation or implication that a public sale, referral, or other transfer of any interest within a debt shall cause the consumer to--
(A) lose any claim or defense to contribution of the debt; or
(B) become subject to any practice prohibited by this subchapter.
(7) The false representation or implication that the consumer committed any crime or other conduct contained by order to disgrace the consumer.
(8) Communicating or threatening to communicate to any character credit information which is known or which should be prearranged to be false, including the failure to communicate that a
disputed debt is disputed.
(9) The use or distribution of any written communication which simulates or is dishonestly represented to be a document authorized, issued, or approved by any court, official, or agency of the United States or any State, or which creates a false impress as to its source, authorization, or approval.
(10) The use of any false representation or deceptive ability to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a consumer.
(11) The anticlimax to disclose in the initial written communication next to the consumer and, in combination, if the initial communication with the consumer is oral, contained by that initial oral communication, that the debt collector is attempting to collect a debt and that any information obtained will be used for that purpose, and the let-down to disclose in subsequent communications that the communication is from a debt collector, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a
formal pleading made surrounded by connection next to a legal endeavour.
(12) The false representation or implication that accounts own been turned over to innocent purchasers for expediency.
(13) The false representation or implication that documents are permitted process.
(14) The use of any business, company, or organization describe other than the true label of the debt collector's business, company, or organization.
(15) The false representation or association that documents are not legal process forms or do not require behaviour by the consumer.
(16) The false representation or implication that a debt collector operate or is employed by a consumer reporting agency as defined by section 1681a(f) of this title.

Hope this answers your cross-question.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The advice contained herein is for informational purposes singular. It is not to be construed as Legal Counsel nor Legal Advice.

Don't be concerned.

If this clown is not willing to provide copies of doesn`t matter what documents he has to prove the reasonableness of the debt (and for you to determine if it is indeed something you owe), then in attendance is no debt. He is trying to scam you.
More question :