what is the definition of a 'legally binding document'? This is specifically in relation to a sale contract, where the salesperson

This is specifically in relation to a sale contract, where the salesperson has calculated the price wrong and it is lower than it should be. The individual prices on the contract are correct, but the total is wrong. I hold signed it with the lower total, but the retailer now requests me to re-sign a new contract next to correct prices. The contract says it is a 'legally binding contract', so does the retailer have to honour the lower price?

Answers:
If the contract individual had a total near one price, then the salesperson would be obligated to honor the price. Since the contract has individual prices that are added up to the total, next the contract would be considered void surrounded by a court of law as it have a calculation error, unless the total say that it has be discounted to be lower than the sum of the individual components.

Other Answers:
i would certainly suggest so. speak to citizens advice.

Sure, but are you prepared to sue the seller to enforce it, and risk a negotiator calling the suit frivolous.

You know full well that the individual prices be right, so trying to force the seller into the lower price due to a maths errors is purely dirty pool. You need to retake "Business Ethics 101".

A reasonably binding contract is one that carries legalized penalties should one or the other jamboree forfeit.

If the seller signed the contract, consequently he is legally bound to honor the contract. However you might want to consider the plus of keeping a good relationship next to this guy and writing a new contract. As the guy above me mentions, it adjectives depends on the judge -- some bench might toss out the suit simply because it's stupid to make a big concord over an error in insert.

This is a hard one. It's clearly a math error, since the correct values are on the top and here is no note of a discount. However i.e. the total you signed for. I think your best bet would be to nickname a law department that offers free consultation. They could probably back you better.

THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. IF YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE SEEK ASSISTANCE OF AN ATTORNEY IN YOUR CITY OR STATE.

This is actually pretty straightforward. First a legall binding document, surrounded by this case a contract for sale/purchase of stock is one which clearly sets for the good to be sold/purchased; the price to be salaried for the goods; the party entering into the agreement; and optimally, the signatures of both parties. In your armour it seems the component prices are correct but the "math" is not correct. I agree with a prior posting which challenge your desire to go to court to force the peddler to adhere to the "lower price" when the details clearly indicate the agreed upon prices. The certainty you actually know and hold acknowledged the listed element prices are correct is enough, surrounded by the eyes of most, to consider such an action a frivolous suit. I also agree beside the other poster who recommended a refresher on ethics. Come on! If the component prices are right but the math is wrong the "real deal" is not in the final price but contained by the unit prices - within essence, that's where you did your bargain. Pay the right price and move forward. Next time remember the lesson learned here: ALWAYS READ THE DOCUMENT up to that time you sign it.